If you purchase a product-say on Ebay, and you receive that item through the post. You
expect only the best for your money. A prompt delivery service,with the goods- unbroken and intact. And also the correct size,colour etc.
Following that, you may or may not- write the sellers a good review or indeed, a bad one. Depending on whether you are happy or unhappy with the seller and in order to recommend or warn off other potential customers.

You can also do the same if you buy (Rent) a girls or woman's body for an hour or so. You can write a good review, if you are happy or a bad review, if you are dissatisfied with the product (service provider).
You can then post it on 'prostitution review sites' such as this U.K one - 'PunterNet'  ("the most successful of the prostitute-reviewing sites" London Evening Standard" )
prostitution reviews

So, if your 'service provider' was compliant and submissive to all of your sexual demands.
 For example- If she was the 'dirtiest' of whores, who likes being slapped in the face, her hair pulled, treated very rough and enjoys being gang raped.  Then you can recommend her to other customers.
On the other hand, if your service provider did not respond well to your sexual demands, because...
[Actual words of the punters]

 'She was psychologically damaged'
 'A drug user'
 'Diseased'
''Slack holed (From too many customers)'
 'Bruised all over and painfully thin'
 'Just lies there, staring coldly at the ceiling'  or 'Behaves like a dead fish or corpse'
 'Does not show enjoyment'
 'Too sore- from up to 20 hole renters a day'
 'Demonstrates horror and disgust'
 'Hates the work and just lies there with her eyes closed' or 'She constantly grimaces in pain and so it only lasts a few minutes'
Then you- as a paying customer, can write your bad review- in order to warn other punters to not waste their money and to stay away from the likes of her.
And even though, many of these punters know, that the majority of these girls and women are prostituted by pimps- via brothels, masquerading as escort agencies, saunas and massage parlours. Who Illegally and with impunity. Continuously rent out- used, abused and damaged goods for cash. The punters don't care.
 Because, they-as customers feel that they are entitled to a first class service. Where they should be able to gratify their most depraved, selfish, degrading sexual fantasies and urges on healthy, sexually motivated and highly responsive women- Who are willing and happy to satisfy their every demand.

Do these punters ever wonder why there are so many unsatisfied customers?
And isn't prostitution illegal in the U.K???
Examples of prostitution reviews by punters (Trigger warning)


http://metro.co.uk/2013/06/13/hello-999-a-prostitute-ive-called-for-sex-is-ugly-3840836/


http://metro.co.uk/2014/02/24/punter-calls-council-to-complain-about-prostitute-who-refused-to-have-sex-with-him-4316251/

aka- hard-core / Gonzo pornography

My Thoughts...
Anyone in the world... including children; At the click of a mouse, can actually watch the most sexually violent crimes in the comfort of their own homes, workplace, school or indeed 'on the go'.
In reality, most people would be horrified if they observed say a 'Gang rape' occurring in front of their eyes and would hopefully help the victim by calling the police. And if it were a child who witnessed such a heinous act, would definitely be in need of therapy for PTSD.

Yet...thousands of adults and children are viewing such sexual violence like gang rape, everyday, all over the globe. These crimes have become to many, both accessible and acceptable in this pornified rape culture of ours.
 One of the psychological aspects of this, is that the consumer can view these act's anonymously, giving a sense of legitimacy and the capability of emotional  aversion and detachment.
Adding to this problem is the false belief that the 'actress' is actually enjoying being gang raped. Which are the lies fed to the consumer by the pornographers.
 Being gang raped by numerous  males would be both psychologically and physically incredibly damaging. And as I have said before- most of the 'actresses' are either trafficking or self abuse victims.
So, even if some of these actresses are genuinely  'enjoying' being gang raped...that does not account for all those who are forced or coerced into these acts. In other words..you don't really know under what circumstances you are watching.

Therefore, these combined elements, psychologically justifies the acceptable viewing of sexual violence. Whether it be curiosity, sex education, entertainment or self gratification; This fuels the demand for more victims (both within pornography and reality) and increased sexual violence, to satisfy those who's cravings escalate, due to a diminished sexual/emotional responsiveness to over exposure of stimulus. It also becomes a serious addiction that can be incredibly detrimental to their psyche.

Overtime and after excessive exposure, these said acts become so tolerant and acceptable, that they lead to total desensitization. Which in turn, promotes a distorted view of beliefs and attitudes; That women crave and enjoy sexual violence. This is especially significant in many young boy's, who's neurological pathways are not mature enough to form social attitudes, moral behaviour, human complexities and world opinion.
 And added to that is the sexualisation of  many young girls, objectification, sexism and self objectification.  Also, the belief that 'females deserve to be raped because of what society and the judicial system implies, by victim blaming and leniency on the perpetrators. There is also the element of social acceptance and tolerance amongst their peers.

So, it is this and the following generations of immature, misguided and impressionable minds, that should cause most concern.
Already, there is a marked increase of 'child sex crimes' incited by pornography...which includes gang rapes by aged 10- 13 year olds as noted in the media and by police agencies.
There is also a marked increase in 'Entertainment rape' amongst young people, who post and share these crimes as mere entertainment.  I think that the words 'shock value' no longer exists in this so called 'freedom of speech' generation. Where young people view sexual crimes on the internet as humorous and make jokes about such horrendous abuses, such as 'gender based violence' and the 'raping of Babies'.
And my belief is that these crimes committed by children will escalate beyond comprehension in the coming years. So if we don't act now..what will our society become, in terms of moral and virtuous behaviour, serious escalation of sexual violence, physical and psychological harm and safety, sexism and misogyny, increased child sex abuse and immeasurable trafficking victims.
The only thing that I believe in helping to combat these attitudes, beliefs and crimes, is to educate young children, by approved, external agencies within schools.
It seems to me, that this age of the internet is regressing to past barbaric acts of  entertainment and acceptance, such as a 'family day out' at public executions, gladiator slayings, public viewing of witch burning and feeding religious people to the lions.

The only difference being, is that they don't go and watch public sexual violence collectively.

They just click..and share.


Porn actresses

Research on the affect of pornography

The links between pornography and sexual violence

porn and sexual violence

porn increases sexual violence

shocking footage of women abused on porn set

scene from 'hardcore'

Hardcore pornographer

Gonzo pornography

I am no longer going to refer to children and women who sell their bodies - as prostitutes or indeed sex workers. These (mainly) victims, do not 'choose' to sell sex in exchange for money. They are 'prostituted' by pimps, who make incredible amounts of money by the persuasive or threatening coercion of the vulnerable and by abducting or purchasing sex slaves. Global prostitution generates an annual revenue of over a $100 billion and it is even more lucrative if you own a sex slave. So, who do you think reaps the rewards?  The prostituted... Or the iniquitous pimps, who will sell children, substance dependants, the poverty stricken and even their own girlfriends and wives? Not to mention that the fastest growing criminal industry is sex trafficking and slavery. In 2009, the united nations stated that about 79% of human trafficking is for prostitution.  I believe that figure has, and is still rising daily. Let's not forget the untold violence imposed upon the prostituted and the extremely high risk of homicides. Since the advent, accessibility and availability  of hard core pornography. Many more sex buyers are acting out their most deviant and violent fantasies on the prostituted. They also don't actually care, if the child or woman is a victim of trafficking. And as for the false belief that there are 'fewer rapes' because of prostitution. Well... just look on the internet at this rape culture of ours.  Besides which -the prostituted are being raped many times a day.
And when I read that social services, police agencies,the media,society and the judiciaries have imposed victim blaming and criminalised young girls for prostitution..my blood boils.
The answer is rather simple. Turn the prostitution industry around. Instead of criminalising the prostitutes or legalising prostitution... Criminalise the PIMPS and the BUYERS..and ensure aid and support to the 'prostituted'.


Future pornstar- groomed since aged 7-now prostituted into pornography
sex buyers and non sex buyers research
child and adult prostitution
talking of prostitution

Tearing the victims apart in court

Victim of sex abuse ring is failed by police and social workers

prostituted women arrested 'named and addresses given'

A typical story of prostituted girls by a pimp

In Victorian England, the male elite kept pornography hidden away from working class men, women and children. Apparently, for their own protection and welfare. They believed that pornography would encourage endless fornication, that would inevitably affect the workforce and corrupt the innocent.
Only they held privy to view, categorise and no doubt 'enjoy' their private collections. That were sought and acquired from every corner of the world.

During the 20th century, there was a complete turnaround. The realisation that selling women's bodies via printed publications, equated to considerable wealth and power. The two main providers (pimps/ procurer's) of this 'Paper prostitution' were again, the male elite. Namely, Rupert Murdoch and his male counterpart Hugh Hefner. Who introduced mainstream pornography into the U.K and America. They have both built their empires, not by selling sex - by selling female body parts.
On acquiring the much 'troubled' sun newspaper in 1969. Rupert Murdoch told the editor Larry Lamb-

"I want a tearaway paper-with lot's of Tit's in it!"

Thereby, confirming the selling of female body parts and depicting females as mere sexual objects. Which possibly caused many of their readers to unwittingly or subconsciously become both voyeurs and objectifiers.
This was a highly profitable rescue for the sun newspaper, whose circulation rose dramatically to 10 million daily readers in 1997.
It now has the ninth largest circulation of any newspaper in the world and the largest circulation of any daily newspaper in the U.K.
In January, it sold around 2.4 million copies a day.
Therefore, axing page 3 could mean financial suicide, by jeopardising it's circulation.
Many women's groups who have criticised page 3 as degrading, are regularly vilified by the Sun, as 'dour' and 'bitter'.
And, former minister Claire Short, who campaigned against page 3 in 1986. Was described as 'Fat and jealous'.
During the Leveson enquiry, Dominic Mohan (present sun editor) defended and justified page 3, by stating-
 "Page 3 celebrates natural beauty"
 Which to my mind, is a dressed up version of 'Using Tit's to sell papers' As his boss, the 'born again Christian' Rupert Murdoch emphasised in 1970.
Mohan also stated "We’re allowed to publish these images (Tit's) and I think it's become quite an innocuous British institution. Where, as a parent myself, I'm more concerned about images that my children might come across on the internet or on digital devices"

Maybe Mohan is pretending to be ignorant of sexual curiosity and pubescent arousal. After all, children naturally become sexually aware, normally around the age of 11. Funnily enough, that is the approximate age of first time, internet porn users.
The fact that soft-core pornography inevitably leads to hard-core pornography is well documented. Besides which, the 'Innocuous and family friendly' sun used to advertise two pages of porn sites. Nowadays, there's less, which usually consists of adverts pertaining to sex chat calls.

Rupert Murdoch is a prominent shareholder in BskyB. Which platforms pornography channels such as Playboy,Telx, red hot tv. and 3D porn.
So in effect, the sun newspaper wittingly and openly contributes to the promotion and viewing of pornography, and to the objectification of females.
 If it were merely a case of 'natural beauty', then why are the majority of page 3 females, slim, white and in their late teens or early twenties? Aren't all women beautiful,whatever their size, shape, age and ethnicity?
And where are the beautiful men?  Is the whole human race ugly, apart from young females?
The Daily mirror stopped featuring topless models in the 1980's, deeming that the images were demeaning to women.

And we all know that Rupert Murdoch has many politicians in his fat pockets. They would never bite the hand that politically and financially feeds them.
David Cameron's stance on banning page 3 was pathetic. He shirked responsibility by stating "It's the parents responsibility, turn the page"
Actually, It's not just children that should be protected David. I as an adult woman, want protection from the daily sexism that I encounter due to the acceptable objectification of females. That swamps women, as they constantly try to climb out of the abyss of historical and contemporary oppression.

 Nick Clegg matched the prime ministers brilliant solution by saying "I do not support a legislative ban on page 3, I believe that government in a liberal society should not dictate the content of newspapers. If you don't like it- don't buy it!"

So, these 'male elite' will continue to dismiss sexism and contribute to the 'Harmless' beginnings of the spiralling devastation of hard core pornography. Which creates countless victims on both sides of this iniquitous road, in the name of wealth and power.
Rupert Murdoch had the audacity to tweet this on May 2nd-  "'Is anyone complaining about Page 3 pix a reader. Enough of this elitist nonsense!' in response to the 'no more page 3 campaign'.

Here is my personal and open letter to those male elitists who sell women's body parts.

All of my life, I have known extreme sexism and still do. I existed merely as a sexual object to gratify males from the age of 18 months, when I was sexually molested by my Uncle. I was sexually abused between the ages of six and eight. By my mothers boyfriend, which mainly took place in the toilet. I can still remember the porn magazines, shoved behind the toilet pipe in front of me- whilst being molested. I continued to suffer sexual abuse, sexual harassment, rape, disrespect and sexual jeering, by every man that I knew or came across. I was surrounded by page 3 and pornography every day. And I grew up, thinking that this was the role of females. To be desired by men and gratify them. To be sexually available whenever and however they wanted.
At 16 years old, I was tricked and abducted by sex traffickers in London. I was forced into pornography and prostitution by violent coercion. Which included being viciously raped, physically beaten and threatened with weapons, including a gun.
These experiences impacted my life. Wasted my life. Destroyed my life.
 I had never been a human being. I had been a fleshed robot, that had obeyed and catered to men's sexual wants and needs. And there are millions of others out there, just like me.
Only last week, I went into my local shop to buy a newspaper. Standing next to me were two builders holding the sun newspaper, opened at page 3. And as I felt their eyes on my body. I was overwhelmed with my personal memories. The degradation and disrespect of being leered at and being only viewed as a sexual object. I do not want my daughter or my granddaughter to have to feel this. To expect this..to accept this.
There are many victims within the realms of pornography. From the detrimental effects on young minds, who have twisted views of females. To the trafficking victims who are forced to perform. To the correlation of pornography and sexual violence. Which includes the increase of child sex attacks, gang rape and the ever increasing 'entertainment rape'.  Which is captured on the internet forever. So, to all those who say "it's harmless fun". It may be for you, who sells it or enjoys looking at it. But you are not on the other end are you?  Please think again, do some research. And you will discover that it's far from harmless. To so many females, in this acceptable and accessible pornified culture of ours.

Lowest regards,

Suzzan Blac.